AI Databases & Vector Stores
Where can I get ApertureData security artifacts for procurement (SOC2 report, pentest verification, RBAC/SSL/auth details)?
6 min read
Most security and procurement teams need more than marketing claims—they need concrete security artifacts like SOC2 reports, pentest summaries, and detailed RBAC/SSL/auth information before approving a new foundational data layer like ApertureDB. Here’s how to get what you need from ApertureData, and what’s available by default versus on request.
Quick Answer: You can request ApertureData’s SOC2 report, pentest verification, and detailed RBAC/SSL/auth documentation directly from the ApertureData team—typically under NDA—by contacting them through the sales or contact form or emailing the team. High‑level security information (e.g., SSL encryption, RBAC support) is publicly documented, while detailed artifacts are shared as part of your security review and procurement process.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where can I access ApertureData’s SOC2 report, pentest results, and security documentation?
Short Answer: Request these artifacts directly from ApertureData during your evaluation or procurement process; they are provided under NDA, not as public downloads.
Expanded Explanation:
ApertureData is SOC2 certified and pentest verified, but like most vendors, they don’t post full reports publicly. Instead, SOC2 reports, third‑party penetration test attestations, and detailed security documentation (including RBAC, SSL, and authentication details) are shared upon request with qualified prospects, customers, and their security/procurement teams—usually under NDA.
The fastest way to get access is to reach out via the contact form or sales channel and mention you need security artifacts for vendor due diligence. The ApertureData team is used to security reviews and can provide the specific documents and answers your risk team needs.
Key Takeaways:
- SOC2 and pentest reports are available from ApertureData on request, typically under NDA.
- High‑level security posture (SSL, RBAC, deployment options) is public; deeper artifacts are shared during formal security review.
How do I request ApertureData security artifacts for procurement?
Short Answer: Submit a request through the ApertureData contact page or your sales contact, specifying that you need SOC2, pentest, and security docs for evaluation.
Expanded Explanation:
Security reviews are now part of almost every data infrastructure purchase. ApertureData expects this and routes such requests through a standard process: you reach out, indicate that you’re in procurement or security review, and the team shares the appropriate artifacts (often gated behind an NDA). This usually includes SOC2 reports, pentest verification, and documentation on RBAC, SSL encryption, authentication, and deployment security.
If your organization has a formal vendor security questionnaire, ApertureData can also work with you to complete it, using the same underlying documentation they provide as part of their audit and compliance posture.
Steps:
- Go to the ApertureData contact page or use your existing sales contact.
- Clearly state that you are requesting security artifacts for procurement (e.g., “SOC2 report, pentest verification, RBAC/SSL/auth details”).
- Execute an NDA if required, then receive the requested documents and/or schedule a security review call.
What’s the difference between the public security info and the private artifacts I get under NDA?
Short Answer: Public information summarizes ApertureData’s security posture (e.g., SSL, RBAC); private artifacts provide detailed evidence—SOC2 reports, pentest results, and in‑depth architecture and control descriptions—for formal risk assessment.
Expanded Explanation:
Public materials focus on clarity and brevity: ApertureData states that ApertureDB Cloud uses SSL‑encrypted communication, supports RBAC, and follows strong security practices, with SOC2 certification and pentest verification. This is enough for early technical validation and high‑level risk sign‑off.
Procurement, security, and compliance teams usually need more: detailed SOC2 reports, pentest summaries, and documentation on access controls, logging, administration, and deployment patterns (e.g., VPC, on‑prem). These artifacts are inherently sensitive and therefore shared only with vetted prospects and customers under NDA.
Comparison Snapshot:
- Public security posture: SSL encryption, RBAC support, Cloud tier details, high‑level compliance claims (SOC2, pentest verified).
- Private security artifacts: Full SOC2 report, pentest attestation/results, detailed RBAC/auth design, logging/administration docs, and answers to your security questionnaire.
- Best for:
- Public info: early evaluation and engineering due diligence.
- Private artifacts: formal vendor risk reviews, procurement, and compliance audits.
What security controls does ApertureDB support (RBAC, SSL, auth) and how are they implemented?
Short Answer: ApertureDB uses SSL for encrypted communication, supports role‑based access control, and provides authentication and administrative controls appropriate for a foundational data layer used in production AI workloads.
Expanded Explanation:
At a minimum, ApertureDB Cloud uses SSL for all in‑flight communication, ensuring your multimodal datasets, embeddings, and graph metadata are encrypted as they move between your applications and the database. Role‑based access control (RBAC) allows you to scope who can access which resources and perform which actions—critical when a single system stores your images, videos, documents, text, annotations/bounding boxes, embeddings, and graph relationships.
More nuanced implementation details—such as roles, permissions, logging, admin flows, and deployment hardening for AWS/GCP/VPC/Docker/on‑prem—are documented in security and architecture materials that ApertureData shares as part of security review. These help your team validate how access is controlled across environments and how operator‑grade safeguards (logging, monitoring, separation of duties) are put in place.
What You Need:
- A security or procurement point of contact to interface with ApertureData.
- An NDA or equivalent agreement so detailed RBAC/SSL/auth documentation and diagrams can be shared.
How does ApertureData’s security posture impact long‑term risk and TCO for our AI stack?
Short Answer: A strong, audited security posture around a unified multimodal data layer reduces integration risk, operational overhead, and compliance friction—lowering total cost of ownership over time.
Expanded Explanation:
Most multimodal AI failures in production are data‑layer failures: fragmented storage, brittle pipelines, and ad‑hoc security bolted onto multiple systems (object store + vector DB + graph DB + metadata store). Each extra system adds an auth model, an audit trail, and a new place to get security wrong.
By consolidating vectors, media (images, video, audio, documents), metadata, and graph relationships into one foundational data layer, ApertureDB lets you standardize on a single set of access controls (RBAC), encryption policies (SSL), and audit/logging practices. SOC2 certification and pentest verification give your security team assurance that these controls are not just designed, but tested and audited.
This reduces the number of vendors to assess, the number of systems to monitor, and the number of security integrations to build and maintain—directly improving time‑to‑production, decreasing on‑call surface area, and keeping TCO predictable.
Why It Matters:
- Lower integration and security overhead: One vector + graph + multimodal database to secure, instead of stitching together 3–5 systems with inconsistent auth and logging.
- Faster approvals and audits: SOC2 and pentest artifacts give your security and compliance teams the evidence they need to approve and periodically re‑certify a core data system without redoing foundational due diligence each time.
Quick Recap
ApertureData’s security artifacts for procurement—SOC2 reports, pentest verification, and detailed RBAC/SSL/auth documentation—are available on request and usually shared under NDA. Public resources highlight the basics (SSL‑encrypted communication, RBAC, Cloud tier posture), while private artifacts give your security team the depth needed for formal vendor risk assessment. Because ApertureDB acts as the unified multimodal memory layer for your AI workloads, a strong, audited security posture at this layer simplifies your overall stack, reduces operational risk, and keeps long‑term TCO under control.